Well, they are going to have a debate over it. The answer may determine the fate of enlightenment for the future of mankind and the question is do you, or don't you support the use of connectomics. Better yet do you, or don't you think you become who you are.
Does, or doesn't it add value to painstakingly trace the path of an existence over time if the resources required are vast?
The debate I bet will be valuable to observe since it has been more than a lifetime of coming to a point that we have enough knowledge on the mind to have one!
I look forward to witnessing the public challenge between these two formiddable proponents as they debate on an organ we thought were 10% thinking, 90% cushy comfort. .
<<90% of the brain are glial cells, and according to a recently published interview with the author of The root of thought, neurons are important too! They are the strings that connectomics hope to tie down to map the way that our mind works, watching in awe of making sense from the wired connections they trace in our brain.>>
Listen to the experts, look at the evidence, use your common sense and say no to connectomics.
